4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 789:
Line 789: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness (view source)
Revision as of 04:14, January 11, 2013
, 04:14, January 11, 2013no edit summary
*22b. Do you deny the possibility that relativity is ''not'' a correct explanation?
*22b. Do you deny the possibility that relativity is ''not'' a correct explanation?
::I believe that future developments will eventually supplant the 20<sup>th</sup> century notion of special and general relativity. But I totally accept it as the correct scientific paradigm for its time, just as Newtonian mechanics was the correct scientific paradigm for its time.
::I believe that future developments will eventually supplant the 20<sup>th</sup> century notion of special and general relativity. But I totally accept it as the correct scientific paradigm for its time, just as Newtonian mechanics was the correct scientific paradigm for its time.
== Almost comical ==
Banned by Karajou (what was his rank in the navy, anyway?) for being TOO open-minded (such that "my brains have fallen out" from it). I thought open-mindedness was a conservative trait that you were trying to foster here? Oh, right, the "right kind" of open-mindedness i.e. are we open-minded enough to accept everything User:Assfly says without question. War is Peace, We've always been at war with East Asia, etc.