Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 131:
Line 131: +
→trolling/parody
I am writing you because of your helpful comments on [[Talk:Main_Page#CBO_just_released_estimates_on_the_.22Fiscal_Cliff.22_Deal]].
I am writing you because of your helpful comments on [[Talk:Main_Page#CBO_just_released_estimates_on_the_.22Fiscal_Cliff.22_Deal]].
That user has gone on to add inaccurate information on a number of articles dealing with the US budget process. He took an accurate article on "spending authority" which last edited in 2008 and redirected it to an article that he had just written called "backdoor spending authority", when I restored the article, he started a thread at [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Spending_authority_vs_Backdoor_spending_authority]] and got the redirect protected. He has gone on to make a number of very inaccurate statements, such as that Presidents do not sign/veto "continuing resolutions" and that the President has not submitted a budget. He confuses spending authority with borrowing authority, etc. This matter requires the attention of senior editors. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 13:09, 12 January 2013 (EST)
That user has gone on to add inaccurate information on a number of articles dealing with the US budget process. He took an accurate article on "spending authority" which last edited in 2008 and redirected it to an article that he had just written called "backdoor spending authority", when I restored the article, he started a thread at [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Spending_authority_vs_Backdoor_spending_authority]] and got the redirect protected. He has gone on to make a number of very inaccurate statements, such as that Presidents do not sign/veto "continuing resolutions" and that the President has not submitted a budget. He confuses spending authority with borrowing authority, etc. This matter requires the attention of senior editors. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 13:09, 12 January 2013 (EST)
:I have had suspicions about that user since he made some additions to the LBJ article that were well over the top. After I questioned those additions they received the approval of a senior admin, which kind of shows my place around here. I will take a look and see what I can do. I must say that I am no expert on the inner workings of the US government. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:10, 12 January 2013 (EST)