Changes

::I would have thought a move from directly proportional to direct proportionality would have been  a better way to go but anyway. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 00:44, 27 January 2013 (EST)

::I would have thought a move from directly proportional to direct proportionality would have been  a better way to go but anyway. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 00:44, 27 January 2013 (EST)

:::You deleted [[Herbert Ives]], [[Directly proportional]] and [[Cavendish Laboratory]] - the latter two for ''pushing e=mc2 nonsense''. It is true that I came up with this subjects while doing research for the articles on [[E=mc²]] and [[Cockcroft and Walton Experiment]], and that I therefore stressed the connection to Einstein's famous formula. But if you don't like this, deleting the articles isn't the right thing to do: all three subjects are worthy of an encyclopedic entry. So improve them! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:56, 27 January 2013 (EST)

:::You deleted [[Herbert Ives]], [[Directly proportional]] and [[Cavendish Laboratory]] - the latter two for ''pushing e=mc2 nonsense''. It is true that I came up with this subjects while doing research for the articles on [[E=mc²]] and [[Cockcroft and Walton Experiment]], and that I therefore stressed the connection to Einstein's famous formula. But if you don't like this, deleting the articles isn't the right thing to do: all three subjects are worthy of an encyclopedic entry. So improve them! And remember: '''"''Conservapedia supports free speech -- even by people we might disagree with. That's a big difference between conservatives and today's liberals''"''' --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:56, 27 January 2013 (EST)