2,358
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + +
no edit summary
The current article jumps back and forth with concepts. We go from the intro to irrational numbers, then to imaginary numbers, and only then do we get the whole "two square roots per number" and "notation" stuff laid down. Anybody mind if I try to re-arrange some stuff? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:43, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
The current article jumps back and forth with concepts. We go from the intro to irrational numbers, then to imaginary numbers, and only then do we get the whole "two square roots per number" and "notation" stuff laid down. Anybody mind if I try to re-arrange some stuff? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:43, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
==Zero==
Wouldn't only all nonzero numbers have two square roots? [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:53, 12 April 2007 (EDT)