Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,704 bytes added ,  18:58, January 29, 2013
Line 507: Line 507:  
So there seems to be no reason not to link to [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]] - especially as the article [[E=mc²]] has many characterizations of an essay itself. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:48, 27 January 2013 (EST)
 
So there seems to be no reason not to link to [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]] - especially as the article [[E=mc²]] has many characterizations of an essay itself. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:48, 27 January 2013 (EST)
 
:I think you have made some very good points AugustO, but its time to move on.  Accept the fact that the article will not be changing and you will have a happier time of it.  Its time to let the readers decider for themselves whether they accept Mr Schlafly's unconventional approach or not.  You are beginning to get repetitive and I suspect there are some admins who are out to get you.  Don't give them the satisfaction.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 03:15, 27 January 2013 (EST)
 
:I think you have made some very good points AugustO, but its time to move on.  Accept the fact that the article will not be changing and you will have a happier time of it.  Its time to let the readers decider for themselves whether they accept Mr Schlafly's unconventional approach or not.  You are beginning to get repetitive and I suspect there are some admins who are out to get you.  Don't give them the satisfaction.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 03:15, 27 January 2013 (EST)
 +
 +
== Problems with the newest edit.. ==
 +
 +
*''The popular ''[[Twilight Zone]]'' series featured '''E=mc²''' prominently, giving the equation greater currency with the public.'' It's perhaps the most recognizable formula today. But I doubt that this was the result of one television series.
 +
*''But light has never been unified with matter despite more than a billion-dollars-worth of attempts, and it is likely impossible to ever do so. '' You keep using this word (unified). I don't think that it means what you think it means. Having mass, energy and the speed of light all appearing in one single equation doesn't necessarily unify these concepts!
 +
*''The claim that '''E=mc²''' has never yielded anything of value and it has often been used as a redefinition of "[[energy]]" for pseudo-scientific purposes by non-scientific journals. '' This is your position, Andrew Schlafly. Nearly all physicists think different - even though they fail to convince you! Therefore it should be made clear that this is the position of critics of the theory...
 +
*''Undeterred, [[liberal]] [[PBS]] insists that the equation is used in [[nuclear power]] generation, [[nuclear weapon]]s, ([[nuclear fusion]], [[nuclear fission]], and speculation about [[antimatter]].'' It's not just PBS, it's virtually all physicists. At the moment, the source is taken from PBS, I'll add other sources which will show that nearly all physicists join in the conspiracy to promote [[E=mc²]]. (like http://scienceinsociety.northwestern.edu/content/articles/2008/research-digest/student-papers/einstein/einstein2019s-theory-of-relativity-implications-beyond-science)
 +
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:58, 29 January 2013 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu