Changes

:::When are we going to get to the section on generalisations (AKA sweeping statements.) [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 14:36, 27 January 2013 (EST)

:::When are we going to get to the section on generalisations (AKA sweeping statements.) [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 14:36, 27 January 2013 (EST)

::::Well when said generalisations are 100% true with no exceptions, such a generalisation is ok.  I have been doing some research at a popular wiki encyclopedia, and I have discovered that all liberals are deceitful and all conservatives are trustworthy!  Any purported conservative that is deceitful is actually just a liberal pretending to be a conservative. Noted liberals like Ted Haggard and Richard Nixon are pretty strong evidence of this phenomenon in action.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:38, 27 January 2013 (EST)

::::Well when said generalisations are 100% true with no exceptions, such a generalisation is ok.  I have been doing some research at a popular wiki encyclopedia, and I have discovered that all liberals are deceitful and all conservatives are trustworthy!  Any purported conservative that is deceitful is actually just a liberal pretending to be a conservative. Noted liberals like Ted Haggard and Richard Nixon are pretty strong evidence of this phenomenon in action.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:38, 27 January 2013 (EST)

==Notes==

==Notes==

*NB that I can use ''he'' here because I know that the author is Andy, a male.  If I were unsure of which gender the author was (or if it were one or multiple authors) I would use "they"

*NB that I can use ''he'' here because I know that the author is Andy, a male.  If I were unsure of which gender the author was (or if it were one or multiple authors) I would use "they"

*Exactly.

*Exactly.