1,767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: +
→Order?
The current article jumps back and forth with concepts. We go from the intro to irrational numbers, then to imaginary numbers, and only then do we get the whole "two square roots per number" and "notation" stuff laid down. Anybody mind if I try to re-arrange some stuff? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:43, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
The current article jumps back and forth with concepts. We go from the intro to irrational numbers, then to imaginary numbers, and only then do we get the whole "two square roots per number" and "notation" stuff laid down. Anybody mind if I try to re-arrange some stuff? --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:43, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
:I'll take that as a "No". Going in... --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:04, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
:I'll take that as a "No". Going in... --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:04, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
::Done. In my eyes, this is a bit more structured than before. Opinions, edits and expansions welcome, of course. Just my suggestion. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:30, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
==Zero==
==Zero==