9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 46:
Line 46: − + Line 53:
Line 53: − ~Jesse+
Debate: At what point does "Human" life begin? (view source)
Revision as of 06:30, February 8, 2013
, 06:30, February 8, 2013→Scientifically speaking
DNA research proves that it is also a unique human organism in that it is not a clone of either of its parents. In other words, it is not "Part" of its mother. It well may be inside of its mother, but if she swallowed a grain of sand, that's not part of her. The baby may also be highly dependent on the mother -- but if she has tape worms in her intestines, those are dependent on her too -- but they are not part of her.
DNA research proves that it is also a unique human organism in that it is not a clone of either of its parents. In other words, it is not "Part" of its mother. It well may be inside of its mother, but if she swallowed a grain of sand, that's not part of her. The baby may also be highly dependent on the mother -- but if she has tape worms in her intestines, those are dependent on her too -- but they are not part of her.
The baby - from the moment of conception - is inside and dependent on but not part of the mother. This is simple biology.
The baby - from the moment of conception - is inside -- and dependent on -- but not part of, the mother. This is simple biology.
The real question is not whether abortion kills an innocent human life -- it always kills an innocent human life.
The real question is not whether abortion kills an innocent human life -- it always kills an innocent human life.
The real question is under what circumstances it is acceptable to kill another human.
The real question is under what circumstances it is acceptable to kill another human.
Those who believe that God created man kind argue that killing another innocent human is wrong.
Those who believe that God created man kind argue that killing another innocent human is wrong.
[[User:Jesseg|Jesseg]] 01:30, 8 February 2013 (EST)