Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 612: Line 612:  
In the case before the court, if the lessee had covenanted for himself and his assigns, to deliver up the tenements in good order and repair, notwithstanding they should be destroyed by act of God or of an Enemy, then this action would certainly lie, because of the special express words; but when there are no such words, but only generally to repair &c. would it be reasonable to construe these words so as to extend to the cases put?
 
In the case before the court, if the lessee had covenanted for himself and his assigns, to deliver up the tenements in good order and repair, notwithstanding they should be destroyed by act of God or of an Enemy, then this action would certainly lie, because of the special express words; but when there are no such words, but only generally to repair &c. would it be reasonable to construe these words so as to extend to the cases put?
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
−
''Pollard v. Shaaffer'', 1 U.S. 210 (1 Dall. 210) (1787).  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 01:15, 9 February 2013 (EST)
+
''Pollard v. Shaaffer'', 1 U.S. 210, 213 (1 Dall. 210) (1787).  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 01:15, 9 February 2013 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,135

edits

Navigation menu