Changes

:::::::::::::Let's be absolutely clear here.  Are you saying that Aschlafly is "incompetent", that he "look(s) like a rambling fool", and that he is "overstep(ping)" the boundaries of his knowledge?  If the answers are "yes, yes, and yes", then please say what you mean directly!  Beating around the bush is a liberal trait.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 08:09, 9 February 2013 (EST)

:::::::::::::Let's be absolutely clear here.  Are you saying that Aschlafly is "incompetent", that he "look(s) like a rambling fool", and that he is "overstep(ping)" the boundaries of his knowledge?  If the answers are "yes, yes, and yes", then please say what you mean directly!  Beating around the bush is a liberal trait.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 08:09, 9 February 2013 (EST)

::::::::::::::'' Beating around the bush is a liberal trait.'' As is incivility. Yes, I'm disappointed by the current state of the article, yes, I'd say that the article is kept in its current state not because of mathematical or physical arguments, but because of the lack of those. Yes, I sometimes get crestfallen by the lack of scientific insight, but no, I wouldn't formulate my frustration the way you want me to do it. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 08:36, 9 February 2013 (EST)

::::::::::::::'' Beating around the bush is a liberal trait.'' As is incivility. Yes, I'm disappointed by the current state of the article, yes, I'd say that the article is kept in its current state not because of mathematical or physical arguments, but because of the lack of those. Yes, I sometimes get crestfallen by the lack of scientific insight, but no, I wouldn't formulate my frustration the way you want me to do it. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 08:36, 9 February 2013 (EST)

== [[Conservapedia proven wrong]] ==

== [[Conservapedia proven wrong]] ==