Changes

:I'll take that as a "No". Going in... --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:04, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

:I'll take that as a "No". Going in... --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:04, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

::Done. In my eyes, this is a bit more structured than before. Opinions, edits and expansions welcome, of course. Just my suggestion. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:30, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

::Done. In my eyes, this is a bit more structured than before. Opinions, edits and expansions welcome, of course. Just my suggestion. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:30, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Thanks, you're right.  I think it might need some more copyediting in order to truly "introduce" topics in order of complexity.  But at least now the article exists - and is already better than it started.  You didn't get a response earlier because you were fixing it about eleven seconds after I saved it ;)  [[User:Human|Human]] 19:13, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Thanks, you're right.  <strike>I think it might need some more copyediting in order to truly "introduce" topics in order of complexity.  But at least now the article exists - and is</strike> already better than it started.  You didn't get a response earlier because you were fixing it about eleven seconds after I saved it ;)  [[User:Human|Human]] 19:13, 12 April 2007 (EDT)  Oops, reason for strikethrough, it's chaged again for the even better! [[User:Human|Human]] 19:18, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

==Zero==

==Zero==