Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + + + + + + + + + +
adding Wells' statements
In fact, the evolutionists were proven wrong yet again: there is no known "junk DNA." Function(s) of introns are slowly being elucidated.
In fact, the evolutionists were proven wrong yet again: there is no known "junk DNA." Function(s) of introns are slowly being elucidated.
Biologist Jonathan Wells calls Junk DNA an anti-scientific [[myth]] that ignores the [[evidence]], impedes research and is based more on [[theology|theological]] speculation than good [[science]].<ref>{{cite book
|title=The Myth of Junk DNA
|author=Jonathan Wells
|publisher=Discovery Institute Press
|year=2011
|isbn=978-1-9365990-0-4
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Rc4ikgAACAAJ&dq=The+Myth+Of+junk+DNA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cXYXUd_GAuTw4QSX_4GQAg&redir_esc=y
}}</ref>
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]]
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]]
*[[Empirical science]]
[[Category:Genetics]]
[[Category:Genetics]]