| Line 690: |
Line 690: |
| | == References == | | == References == |
| | <references/> | | <references/> |
| | + | |
| | + | == too many reversions needed to include key statements; can suggest edits on talk page == |
| | + | |
| | + | Very well: I suggest that this version is restored: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=E%3Dmc%C2%B2&oldid=1034198 revision 1034198]. Reason: it has been shown above that the reversions done by Andrew Schlafly are unscientific. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 22:33, 11 February 2013 (EST) |