Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
101 bytes added ,  03:57, February 12, 2013
Line 695: Line 695:  
Very well: I suggest that this version is restored: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=E%3Dmc%C2%B2&oldid=1034198 revision 1034198]. Reason: it has been shown above that the reversions done by Andrew Schlafly are unscientific. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 22:33, 11 February 2013 (EST)
 
Very well: I suggest that this version is restored: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=E%3Dmc%C2%B2&oldid=1034198 revision 1034198]. Reason: it has been shown above that the reversions done by Andrew Schlafly are unscientific. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 22:33, 11 February 2013 (EST)
 
:Give it a rest.  For your sake as well as everyone else.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 22:48, 11 February 2013 (EST)
 
:Give it a rest.  For your sake as well as everyone else.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 22:48, 11 February 2013 (EST)
 +
::What good would this do for this article? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 22:57, 11 February 2013 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu