Changes

== Comments can be made below ==

== Comments can be made below ==

Proud to say that I was one of the two that earned a 29/30--I was very impressed by the substance of the test! Although I wasn't following along with the course, I have to say that only my time at law school saved me.  That is, had I been given such a test in high school, I would have done very poorly; this (important!) material simply was not covered in my public education.  

Proud to say that I was one of the three that earned a 29/30--I was very impressed by the substance of the test! Although I wasn't following along with the course, I have to say that only my time at law school saved me.  That is, had I been given such a test in high school, I would have done very poorly; this (important!) material simply was not covered in my public education.  

I did have one comment about the question concerning which answer was a refutation of "one man-one vote" principals: I selected Article III (which was wrong) because of the structure of un-elected, lifetime appointed federal judges.  Is this answer merely "less correct"?  Thanks for a challenging test! [[User:WilliamWB|WilliamWB]] 09:15, 12 February 2013 (EST)

I did have one comment about the question concerning which answer was a refutation of "one man-one vote" principals: I selected Article III (which was wrong) because of the structure of un-elected, lifetime appointed federal judges.  Is this answer merely "less correct"?  Thanks for a challenging test! [[User:WilliamWB|WilliamWB]] 09:15, 12 February 2013 (EST)