1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + +
Talk:Global warming (view source)
Revision as of 18:54, February 13, 2013
, 18:54, February 13, 2013→Let's put our thinking caps on
:Many centrists are now convinced of Global Frauding. Climategate showed how deep the lies really are. [[User:Teapartyman]]
:Many centrists are now convinced of Global Frauding. Climategate showed how deep the lies really are. [[User:Teapartyman]]
::You know, it's funny. Very recently, I was on Wikipedia, and I went to the "scientific opinion on climate change" page. It was incredibly biased. it said "the scientific opinion on climate change is that the earth is unequivocally warming", and it didn't even mention anyone who didn't even mention any deniers. That's what I call biased. I wrestled with them for ages, but I couldn't get them to change it, because they were so attached to their ideas. Then, I came here, expecting to find an unbiased site. To my horror, this page is just as biased as Wikipedia, only in the opposite direction. Why is it that all of these encyclopedia's have to be so radically leftist or rightist as to be completely biased? Why can't this page be UNBIASED, and show each side equally? If people think that only showing the RADICAL conservative opinion on climate change is going to make people take this site seriously, they're definitely wrong. -Cybersaur
== Other planets ==
== Other planets ==