Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 470: Line 470:     
What is the point of having two sections, "Origins", and "History"; seems redundant, unless we plan to document each twist and turn in the road where a redfinition took place. " Criticisms of a one-dimensional view " is flawed and meaningless, cause nobody agrees on anything else to begin with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:28, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
 
What is the point of having two sections, "Origins", and "History"; seems redundant, unless we plan to document each twist and turn in the road where a redfinition took place. " Criticisms of a one-dimensional view " is flawed and meaningless, cause nobody agrees on anything else to begin with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:28, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*I agree, Rob. I think we are all thinking too detailed, and some articles, like this one, would be better presented in a more vague, less detailed way.  Thoughts? --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:44, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu