SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
388
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 162:
Line 162: + + + + +
User talk:DamianJohn (view source)
Revision as of 10:19, February 18, 2013
, 10:19, February 18, 2013Thank you reply.
::::: It would be interesting to see how a dual T20 (2 innings each, basically ODI/T20 hybrid) international would play out. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 22:30, 17 February 2013 (EST)
::::: It would be interesting to see how a dual T20 (2 innings each, basically ODI/T20 hybrid) international would play out. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 22:30, 17 February 2013 (EST)
::::::Didn't you guys try that out in your domestic 50 overs competition a few years back? How did it work? --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 23:24, 17 February 2013 (EST)
::::::Didn't you guys try that out in your domestic 50 overs competition a few years back? How did it work? --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 23:24, 17 February 2013 (EST)
== Thanks mate ==
DJ, I genuinely do appreciate the fact that you defended me. The funny thing is that I never even realized that I had been blocked before, until that particular conversation on Andy's talk page popped up! I had no clue. Honestly, I can see how ''some'' editors here could consider my actions as "trolling", but I believe this may be due to the way I approach "controversial" issues.
It's not very hard to get out of people WHAT they believe, the trick is figuring out WHY they think that way. So, I have no problem with admins editing entries to include what they believe, but when they don't include the reasons why... it gets my hackles up. I guess everybody has their weaknesses. --[[User:DonnyC|DonnyC]] 05:19, 18 February 2013 (EST)