54
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
→Warning: sneaky how?
==Warning==
==Warning==
Nice try with the sneaky edit to [[dog]]. We're not stupid, you know. [[User:Brenden|Brenden]] 15:53, 13 February 2013 (EST)
Nice try with the sneaky edit to [[dog]]. We're not stupid, you know. [[User:Brenden|Brenden]] 15:53, 13 February 2013 (EST)
:I don't see the sneakiness. Are you under the mistaken impression that I authored that paragraph? I ''reverted'' [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dog&diff=1024598&oldid=1024569 this edit] by [[User:MattyD]] which deleted a large section from the article [[dog]]. Under different circumstances, I might have given the other editor the benefit of the doubt, but MattyD has been permanently blocked and the deleted section had been stable for more than a year. Safest course of action was to revert. My [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dog&diff=next&oldid=1024608 edit summary] accurately stated what I had done. I admit I didn't pay very close attention to the content after the first few sentences. It does get a bit strange at the end. [[User:Spielman|Spielman]] 23:29, 20 February 2013 (EST)