Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 251: Line 251:     
Please do not jump to conclusions.  I did not create a new account to evade a block.  I checked the previous username this morning and it was no longer blocked.  The user that blocked me (Markman) gave as one of the reasons for the block, that I had used a user name which violated conservapedia policy (a policy which I searched for but could not find).  Out of respect for Marman's complaint about my user name, I created a new acount in order to comply with the conservapedia policy on usernames (which, again, I could not find).  I am sorry, but I am not familiar with this forum and I don't really know what "diff" means.  Finally, I also do not know what would be the proper channel for this commentary.  I read (in its entirety) the page linked as "conservapedia commandments" and all the pages linked to from that page.  Im also not sure what you mean by "unsigned".  I was logged in when I made the original comments and I didnt realize that a signature was needed in addition to being logged in.  Also, I did not intend to use inflammatory language in the initial post.  It was more a reaction to being blocked under false pretenses and I did not mean to offend anyone.  Sorry about my ingorance of this forum, but I am new to the entire wiki process.  Is there some sort of tutorial or guidelines available on the site?  Thanks, Mikers.
 
Please do not jump to conclusions.  I did not create a new account to evade a block.  I checked the previous username this morning and it was no longer blocked.  The user that blocked me (Markman) gave as one of the reasons for the block, that I had used a user name which violated conservapedia policy (a policy which I searched for but could not find).  Out of respect for Marman's complaint about my user name, I created a new acount in order to comply with the conservapedia policy on usernames (which, again, I could not find).  I am sorry, but I am not familiar with this forum and I don't really know what "diff" means.  Finally, I also do not know what would be the proper channel for this commentary.  I read (in its entirety) the page linked as "conservapedia commandments" and all the pages linked to from that page.  Im also not sure what you mean by "unsigned".  I was logged in when I made the original comments and I didnt realize that a signature was needed in addition to being logged in.  Also, I did not intend to use inflammatory language in the initial post.  It was more a reaction to being blocked under false pretenses and I did not mean to offend anyone.  Sorry about my ingorance of this forum, but I am new to the entire wiki process.  Is there some sort of tutorial or guidelines available on the site?  Thanks, Mikers.
 +
 +
:Here's the [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_Agenda&action=historysubmit&diff=1035658&oldid=1035638 diff] of Markman reverting this user's edits. Mikers is right that at least some of the sentences he deleted are in clear violation of Conservapedia guidelines. [[User:Onestone|Onestone]] 13:07, 22 February 2013 (EST)
71

edits

Navigation menu