2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 145:
Line 145: +
Talk:Young Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 02:51, April 13, 2007
, 02:51, April 13, 2007→Title does not fit content
Perhaps that means that the [[evolution]] article shouldn't defer to one perspective, then?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:46, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps that means that the [[evolution]] article shouldn't defer to one perspective, then?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:46, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Ames, I have no idea what you are saying. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:48, 12 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
::::Ames, I have no idea what you are saying. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:48, 12 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
The converse is a concern I have expressed to you. I am just arguing that if the YEC viewpoint is represented so very well here, maybe it shouldn't all be on the evolution page, but instead have a reference FROM the evolution page to this page. To cut down on server size and be better organized.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:51, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
== Anyone Notice... ==
== Anyone Notice... ==
That this is almost the same article as [[evolution]]?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:40, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
That this is almost the same article as [[evolution]]?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:40, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
: *downgrades the headline level* Yes. *points at upper two sections* And Tsumetai's deletion of the duplicate material juuuust got reverted. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
: *downgrades the headline level* Yes. *points at upper two sections* And Tsumetai's deletion of the duplicate material juuuust got reverted. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)