2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 148:
Line 148: + +
Talk:Young Earth Creationism (view source)
Revision as of 03:10, April 13, 2007
, 03:10, April 13, 2007→Title does not fit content
:::::The panel already ruled on the theory of evolution article AmesG. It is not being gutted. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:09, 12 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
:::::The panel already ruled on the theory of evolution article AmesG. It is not being gutted. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:09, 12 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
It was totally worth a try. I'm sure if we came to a consensus, though, they would respect it.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 23:10, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
== Anyone Notice... ==
== Anyone Notice... ==
That this is almost the same article as [[evolution]]?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:40, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
That this is almost the same article as [[evolution]]?-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:40, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
: *downgrades the headline level* Yes. *points at upper two sections* And Tsumetai's deletion of the duplicate material juuuust got reverted. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
: *downgrades the headline level* Yes. *points at upper two sections* And Tsumetai's deletion of the duplicate material juuuust got reverted. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 22:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)