Changes

:I'm beginning to loose count how many there are (see post at Talk/MP). Yes, it is a problem. The main sequestration article is in category legal terms, so fixing sequester & sequestration should begin there, w/redirs to a disambig, don't you think?  [[User:OscarO|OscarO]] 15:30, 2 March 2013 (EST)

:I'm beginning to loose count how many there are (see post at Talk/MP). Yes, it is a problem. The main sequestration article is in category legal terms, so fixing sequester & sequestration should begin there, w/redirs to a disambig, don't you think?  [[User:OscarO|OscarO]] 15:30, 2 March 2013 (EST)

::I think the legal term usage is relatively unimportant and should be folded in to the article itself--my thought would be that the usage of the term is going to be limited to this event.  I will participate in the other discussions.  [[User:WilliamWB|WilliamWB]] 18:23, 2 March 2013 (EST)

::I think the legal term usage is relatively unimportant and should be folded in to the article itself--my thought would be that the usage of the term is going to be limited to this event.  I will participate in the other discussions.  [[User:WilliamWB|WilliamWB]] 18:23, 2 March 2013 (EST)

::This current law has been around since 1986. Previously it was called impoundment. Both Reagan & Clinton wanted some form of line-item veto, and sequester is what they got. I'm not sure if both Reagan & Clinton used it, though. [[User:OscarO|OscarO]] 03:39, 3 March 2013 (EST)

:::This current law has been around since 1986. Previously it was called impoundment. Both Reagan & Clinton wanted some form of line-item veto, and sequester is what they got. I'm not sure if both Reagan & Clinton used it, though. [[User:OscarO|OscarO]] 03:39, 3 March 2013 (EST)