SkipCaptcha
3,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 174:
Line 174: + + + + + + +
→DonnyC
::This conversation is over, I have nothing more to say to you after that moronic block you gave me. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 04:30, 27 February 2013 (EST)
::This conversation is over, I have nothing more to say to you after that moronic block you gave me. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 04:30, 27 February 2013 (EST)
:::Good. I want nothing to do with a bully like you. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 04:32, 27 February 2013 (EST)
:::Good. I want nothing to do with a bully like you. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 04:32, 27 February 2013 (EST)
==DonnyC==
Wait, am I seeing what I think I'm seeing? DamianJohn? On my talk page? I thought he didn't want anything to do with a bully like me... Anyway, Donny earned his ban fair and square. He used a direct insult against Conservative by calling him a conglomerate and accusing him of being deceitful and pretentious. Seeing that he has been given in the past several different blocks from several different users (all blocks were found to be justified), and seeing that I gave him a [[User talk:DonnyC#Warning|warning]] about his incivility before the recent block, a month long ban is quite justified.
However, I'm a willing to make a deal with you. Since I gather you might have more influence on Donny than me, I won't reinstate his ban the next time you overturn it if you'll warn him about engaging in any further acts of incivility. So long as he'll behave he won't need to fear me, but one violation of the rules of the encyclopedia will get him a lifetime ban.
And finally, so far the only complaint Andy had about the blocks I have given was [[User talk:Markman#Great blocks |this]], so I guess I'm doing my job just fine. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 16:15, 3 March 2013 (EST)