Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 206: Line 206:     
:::::Quite frankly I'm disappointed that you return to name calling after I thought we manged to establish some common ground. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 16:04, 4 March 2013 (EST)
 
:::::Quite frankly I'm disappointed that you return to name calling after I thought we manged to establish some common ground. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 16:04, 4 March 2013 (EST)
 +
::::::I'm sorry buddy but that is not true.  You said above: " ''you and AlanA have a warped perspective of what happened. Karajou deleted the article after he found out it was a parody article, without any prompting from me. I merely put the delete template after the article was gone - why have a talk page for an article that no longer exists?''".  Your statement is at significant variance with what happened, perhaps you were hoping that we hadn't noticed what you actually did. 
 +
::::::Anyway all this is immaterial, your job is to block obvious trolls and parodists, not enforce your rather warped interpretation of the 90/10 rule, not perform marginal blocks on constructive editors for trivial reasons, and above all else, not pick fights with people for absolutely no reason.  If you don't want to read Conservative and others engage in debate then don't read it.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:47, 4 March 2013 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907

edits

Navigation menu