Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
4,575
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + + + +
no edit summary
::?? What are you talking about?? [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 15:38, 8 March 2013 (EST)
::?? What are you talking about?? [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 15:38, 8 March 2013 (EST)
:::Slandering me, throwing unfounded accusation at me, etc. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 15:41, 8 March 2013 (EST)
:::Slandering me, throwing unfounded accusation at me, etc. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 15:41, 8 March 2013 (EST)
??What are you talking about?? Pretty-well everything I have said to you has been as a reaction to something you have said or done to me. And I believed what I said at the time. I even started typing an apology at one stage but it got tied up in an edit-conflict and you did something against me so I gave up on it. I would have had a chat about it but you are one of those without an email address.
I agree with those who have seen an unfactual stub or piece of parody and deleted it and replaced it with something worthy of the encyclopedia. I think that those that delete and move on or put a tag on it and move on are intellectually lazy. I have had someone say to me: "this needs references" and I don't mind that - and I give it references. It has not happened since 2008 though (I think). Everything I have typed as fact here I sincerely believe to be fact, and no amount of references can ensure it is fact unless it has been copied-and-pasted, because people misread things or see facts through the prism of their own ideologies. You go through the links and/or references of some editors and they no longer exist or they are a blog post. Are these useful citations?
You are putting me through this and plastering tags all over my edits for malicious reasons. I am quite often angry and get sarcastic but rarely am I malicious. If I am to properly reference every article you tag it will take me the rest of the year and stop me doing anything productive during that time. In other words, the encyclopedic part of Conservapedia will suffer. It seems you don't mind that happening. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 16:41, 8 March 2013 (EST)