238
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 294:
Line 294: + +
→Most logical book?: couldn't resist but still i question that as well, seems more a promotion of the bible instead of an article to have the header as is
Of course it's nonsense, but could you please provide explanation for every so-called "contradictions" so that I could use it against them.
Of course it's nonsense, but could you please provide explanation for every so-called "contradictions" so that I could use it against them.
:How is anyone supposed to respond to that massive list? It would take days to research all those claimed contradictions. I can't speak for all of them, but some of their claimed "contradictions" are particularly silly. For example, number 31, claiming that Prov 26:4 contradicts Prov 26:5. Do you really think two adjacent verses would contradict each other? Wouldn't someone have noticed it by now? Or could it be, that the passage is describing what we call today a catch-22 situation? i.e. arguing with fools is not a wise course of action, but sometimes one has little choice. A Catch-22 situation is contradictory in a sense, but then it is life itself that is being contradictory here, not the Book of Proverbs. [[User:ZackMartin|ZackMartin]] 08:13, 25 June 2012 (EDT)
:How is anyone supposed to respond to that massive list? It would take days to research all those claimed contradictions. I can't speak for all of them, but some of their claimed "contradictions" are particularly silly. For example, number 31, claiming that Prov 26:4 contradicts Prov 26:5. Do you really think two adjacent verses would contradict each other? Wouldn't someone have noticed it by now? Or could it be, that the passage is describing what we call today a catch-22 situation? i.e. arguing with fools is not a wise course of action, but sometimes one has little choice. A Catch-22 situation is contradictory in a sense, but then it is life itself that is being contradictory here, not the Book of Proverbs. [[User:ZackMartin|ZackMartin]] 08:13, 25 June 2012 (EDT)
:::Even more logical than "Spock's Guide To Logic"? --DavidS 19:23, 16 March 2013 (EDT)
== Can be opened for posting? ==
== Can be opened for posting? ==
Can this http://bertschlossberg.blogspot.com/2012/11/jesus-through-fabric-of-our-lives.html be posted under the title "Jesus through the Fabric of our Lives" in External Links ? Thank you!
Can this http://bertschlossberg.blogspot.com/2012/11/jesus-through-fabric-of-our-lives.html be posted under the title "Jesus through the Fabric of our Lives" in External Links ? Thank you!