Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
336 bytes added ,  19:51, March 21, 2013
→‎Lead paragraph: couldn't find any conservatives to back it up
Line 843: Line 843:  
:I agree that the Lead seems at odds with the rest of the article. The conflict, as I see it, is that on the one hand we want to make referenced verifiable statements, but on the other hand, we don't want to give any credence to a crackpot theory that drives people away from scripture. I think we can accomplish both. There are plenty of articles on non-Christian and liberal topics -- Islam, Communism, etc.  Why not present E=mc^2 as a similar system of beliefs. Accurately parrot what a group of people say about matter and energy, but effectively bracket all the content with "liberals believe (_____)".  Then everything within those brackets can at least be the actual claptrap that liberals promote. [[User:Spielman|Spielman]] 11:27, 17 March 2013 (EDT)
 
:I agree that the Lead seems at odds with the rest of the article. The conflict, as I see it, is that on the one hand we want to make referenced verifiable statements, but on the other hand, we don't want to give any credence to a crackpot theory that drives people away from scripture. I think we can accomplish both. There are plenty of articles on non-Christian and liberal topics -- Islam, Communism, etc.  Why not present E=mc^2 as a similar system of beliefs. Accurately parrot what a group of people say about matter and energy, but effectively bracket all the content with "liberals believe (_____)".  Then everything within those brackets can at least be the actual claptrap that liberals promote. [[User:Spielman|Spielman]] 11:27, 17 March 2013 (EDT)
 
::From everything that I have read, social conservatives and political conservatives believe that E=mc<sup>2</sup> is true.  I understand that there is some controversy about general relativity, but I have never read any coherent source that explains how it "drives people away from scripture."  E=mc<sup>2</sup> is one of many beautiful facts about nature that support the idea of a creator; many people say that the development of the Atom bomb just in time to end World War II was God-inspired.  Please direct me to a serious source to the contrary, and I will take a look.  (A self-published book is not the type of reliable source that would convince me.) Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 00:19, 21 March 2013 (EDT)
 
::From everything that I have read, social conservatives and political conservatives believe that E=mc<sup>2</sup> is true.  I understand that there is some controversy about general relativity, but I have never read any coherent source that explains how it "drives people away from scripture."  E=mc<sup>2</sup> is one of many beautiful facts about nature that support the idea of a creator; many people say that the development of the Atom bomb just in time to end World War II was God-inspired.  Please direct me to a serious source to the contrary, and I will take a look.  (A self-published book is not the type of reliable source that would convince me.) Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 00:19, 21 March 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Maybe there is evidence that RINOs like Karl Rove or Arnold Schwarzenegger believe the equation, but I've never heard a real conservative support it. I think Mr Schlafly himself used language to the effect that it moves people away from the Bible. Isn't that "coherent" enough? [[User:Spielman|Spielman]] 15:51, 21 March 2013 (EDT)
54

edits

Navigation menu