366 bytes added
, 15:52, April 13, 2007
Ed, why did you revert my edits? It should be clear in the article that the book in question is controversial and generally ignored as being bad science in the scientific community. I can understand that you might not share the same point of view, but as it is now the article is factually incorrect. [[User:Arctic Nation|Arctic Nation]] 11:52, 13 April 2007 (EDT)