Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
3,587
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 104:
Line 104: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Main Page/Archive index/125 (view source)
Revision as of 06:30, April 10, 2013
, 06:30, April 10, 2013archiving closed discussion
[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 15:00, 31 March 2013 (EDT)
[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 15:00, 31 March 2013 (EDT)
:Today is definitely a day to rejoice and not feed the [[user:Conservative|trolls]] -[[User:EdgarP|EdgarP]] 16:02, 31 March 2013 (EDT)
:Today is definitely a day to rejoice and not feed the [[user:Conservative|trolls]] -[[User:EdgarP|EdgarP]] 16:02, 31 March 2013 (EDT)
== Strange Priorities ==
Yesterday Baroness Thatcher, the greatest politician (conservative or otherwise) of the late 20th century, died after a long and immensely productive life. CP's recognition of this fact was one sentence on the main page and a link to a good article on CNAV. Meanwhile MPR continued to drown under a flood of incoherent linkspam from the QE! blog. Anyone who thinks the death of Margaret Thatcher is less newsworthy than yet another dull speech by William Lane Craig, or yet another debate challenge by someone who's too much of a {{Personal remark removed}} to actually debate himself, is delusional. if CP wants to retain ''any'' credibility please stop this {{Personal remark removed}} from turning the main page into a laughing stock.--[[User:BrandonST|BrandonST]] 08:13, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
:Jesus is the King of Kings and He has had a profound effect on Western culture and conservatism and now is His influence is exploding in the Eastern World. Dr. [[William Lane Craig]], despite his old earth leanings, is one of the world's foremost Christian apologists, and he not only won his debate against an atheist philosopher at a leading university in a gentlemanly way, but his opponent became a: quivering bowl of jelly; a dry mouth water chugging nervous wreck; a stubborn defender of obvious irrationalism; and a bitter whiner who totally embarrassed himself with his lack of machismo! It was a glorious victory for Christendom![http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/04/dr-william-lane-craig-beats-crazy.html][http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/04/biola-university-uploaded-christian.html] "Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?" - The Apostle Paul. It is you my friend who has strange priorities! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:42, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::I think Brandon was complaining about Conservapedia largely ignoring the death of Baroness Thatcher but giving lots of attention to some anonymous blog that does nothing much but link to itself.--[[User:EugeneH|EugeneH]] 08:47, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
:::Does not that blog link to [[Shockofgod]]? What are you complaining about?!!!! :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:03, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::::Yes, it links to Shockofgod. So what? Shock means well but he's a bit of a joke. Personally I agree with Brandon; from a conservative point of view, the death of Margaret Thatcher is far more significant than more waffle being published on some incoherent anonymous blog. The UK press is full of reactions, plans for her funeral and retrospectives of her life, but nobody cares about Shock (or WLC for that matter.) That's not because there's a cover-up; it's because Shock is just some guy with a motorbike who makes YouTube videos. He's not in the news because he isn't newsworthy, and neither is that pathetic blog. Conservative News and Views is well written and informative; it's worth promoting. The Question Evolution blog? Nah, it's just linkspam. Today, and every day until next Wednesday, I will be mourning Margaret Thatcher. I couldn't care less about Shock or WLC, because one is a nonentity and the other is a tedious windbag. Let's celebrate REAL conservatives here, not inept bloggers.--[[User:EugeneH|EugeneH]] 09:11, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::::: I agree. Could you please unlock the Penn Jillette article so I can get it back to a decent state from the current dogs breakfast it is in at the moment ?[[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:14, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::::::Huh? It's locked? That's truly bizarre. Who did that??--[[User:EugeneH|EugeneH]] 09:16, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::::::: Also RE shock of god: How can one trust a person with such an unnatural interest in violent video games ? Maybe you should tell him he should stop playing them as it will effect his health. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:23, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
:::::Back to the death of Baroness Thatcher and QE blog links, I strongly suggest creating a blacklist of discouraged "news sources". It would serve Conservapedia well in stopping the disproportionate ratio of links to QE to other more varied news sources. The story on the Steubenville rape case, for example, has never been featured on MPR, yet in the time elapsed, no less than 7 QE stories have been featured. [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 13:29, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
On reading Conservapedia deeper you will release that user conservative is a rampant anglophobe, read his articles on the UK and bestiality,the UK and uncharitableness, the UK and its hatred of the underdog and you will understand more. I call on Mr Schlafaly to put a stop to user:Conservative's rampant hatred of the great country that is The United Kingdom before Conservapedia becomes a bastion of hatred of anything that does not fit into User:Conservative's very narrow and hate filled worldview.--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 17:31, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::Anglophobe? I/we recently had lunch with a businessman friend of mine/ours who is from the UK. I/we also helped him with some editing of his upcoming book which he was about to submit to a literary agent. Second, you don't know where I/we live. For all you know, I/we could live in the UK. Next, where is this alleged UK and uncharitableness article? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:00, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
I will have to find it but you admit the bestiality article?
and your disrespect for Baroness Thatcher is well, disrespectful. Oh, and I know you're American, you know that and most contributors here know that so it is not so much a moot point than any point at all. I will just see how long it takes you to block me know: Suggested reason for blocking: defending his country, which is am sure you will agree, a good conservative should do?
--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 18:12, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::Patmac, I/we am getting the distinct impression that you are person who likes to throw out unsubstantiated charges and when you make a mistake, you are too proud to admit it. Again, where is this alleged UK and uncharitableness article? If you don't bring it forth, I/we demand an apology. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:27, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
I appologise to you about the uncharitable article.
It was here on conservapedia but as you don't about it obviously was not written by you and i was wrong to suggest it.I have no reason to, and do not doubt your integrity whatsoever. But do you admit to writing a number of articles about the UK which could be considered insulting to a British person?
--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 18:37, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::Patmac, that is an inadequate apology. Please show that a UK and uncharitableness article was ever at Conservapedia. Are you too proud to admit you were totally off base? It certainly seems so! I/we theorize that you are a proud UK atheist/evolutionist given your sloppily put together accusation and your unwillingness to be held fully accountable for your folly. See: [[Atheism and deception]] and [[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]. Please let us know when you want to be fully accountable for your folly. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:44, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
I am not an atheist, I am a christian, albeit a member of the Church of England. And what has my faith got to do with at all? I have appologised but you have not answered one of my questions or points, just turned it on it's head and now I am the bad guy. Now my appology stands. I cannot find the article but it was here, I commented on it but my remark was removed, probably because I used a vulgar word, saying the article was "a load of bo***KS",now please address my points on the underdog and bestiality articles?
PS. You mention people don't want to debate you, the reason being is you do not debate, you just accuse and don't accept contrition when it is offered
--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 18:52, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
::Patmac, just as I suspected. A proud evolutionist who is too proud to admit the extent of his folly. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:57, 9 April 2013 (EDT)
Ha Ha Ha, I am not not an evolutionist and i am not a Liberal. '''HOW ON EARTH CAN I BE A LIBERAL WHEN THE WHOLE REASON I STARTED THIS MODE OF CONVERSATION BY SUPPORTING MARGARET THATCHER, A WELL KNOWN LIBERAL SOCIALIST COMMIE WHO WAS HATED BY CONSERVATIVES THE WORLD OVER?--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 19:02, 9 April 2013 (EDT)'''