Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 222:
Line 222: + + + +
→Point of view: the concept of a finding
:::I would be fine with that:). I reverted what had been posted before and added additional links since yesterday they were not avalible online. I guess the other issue was the total removal of the scientific community's consensus as well, not the chicken thing as much as the age thing.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 12:41, 13 April 2007 (EDT)--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 12:39, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I would be fine with that:). I reverted what had been posted before and added additional links since yesterday they were not avalible online. I guess the other issue was the total removal of the scientific community's consensus as well, not the chicken thing as much as the age thing.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 12:41, 13 April 2007 (EDT)--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 12:39, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps I have not made myself clear. The problem is with the concept of a [[finding]]. We need to say (1) that scientists '''think''' there's a connection between raptors and chickens and (2) that this important because (as they 'think') it '''demonstrates''' (illustrates? proves?) once and for all that the [[Theory of evolution]] is true and all those YECs are [[dodo]]s (i.e., birdbrains doomed to extinction).
Or something like that - anyway, that's the [[subtext]]. By the way, I keep making all these red links for a reason. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:42, 13 April 2007 (EDT)