I stated that creationist positions on human-monkey relations is justified by a lack of transitional fossils
Line 1:
Line 1:
[[Image:Olive baboon.jpg|thumb|right|300px|An Olive baboon, a kind of monkey]]
[[Image:Olive baboon.jpg|thumb|right|300px|An Olive baboon, a kind of monkey]]
−
A '''monkey''' is a [[polypheletic]] classification of any long tailed [[primate]] that is not a [[prosimian]]. Varieties of them can be found in [[South America]], [[Africa]] and [[Asia]]. [[Evolutionists]] believe that [[humans]] and monkeys, like all species, share a common ancestor, which is disputed by [[creation scientists]].
+
A '''monkey''' is a [[polypheletic]] classification of any long tailed [[primate]] that is not a [[prosimian]]. Varieties of them can be found in [[South America]], [[Africa]] and [[Asia]]. [[Evolutionists]] believe that [[humans]] and monkeys, like all species, share a common ancestor, which is disputed by more accurate [[creation scientists]]. A lack of transitional fossils between apes and humans supports the creationist side.