Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎typo: for Bureaucrat to fix
Line 474: Line 474:  
**That's the hard part; I thought calling it a theory gave us the opportunity to speak in vaguaries and generalities, but we haven't got a concensus on that. So that means we gotta present detailed facts and keep misinformation out.
 
**That's the hard part; I thought calling it a theory gave us the opportunity to speak in vaguaries and generalities, but we haven't got a concensus on that. So that means we gotta present detailed facts and keep misinformation out.
 
**Repeatedly, how the problem works is this: a student becomes indoctrinated into the vague concept of "Leftism";  then whatever hackneyed idea can dressed up as "leftist" becomes kosher, and whatever needs to be demonized is simply called right-wing reactionary, and no real analysis of substance or content takes place.  That why I say it should not be used as a "point of origin", but rather has only value comparatively, i.e. after detailed analysis of substance and content is completed.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:58, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
 
**Repeatedly, how the problem works is this: a student becomes indoctrinated into the vague concept of "Leftism";  then whatever hackneyed idea can dressed up as "leftist" becomes kosher, and whatever needs to be demonized is simply called right-wing reactionary, and no real analysis of substance or content takes place.  That why I say it should not be used as a "point of origin", but rather has only value comparatively, i.e. after detailed analysis of substance and content is completed.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:58, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==typo==
 +
 +
"Islam of Czarist Russia" (end of first paragraph under "definitions")should obviously be an "or" not "of", fix at your leisure... [[User:Human|Human]] 14:22, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
2,014

edits

Navigation menu