Changes

In addition to my previously stated and overarching goal of increasing Conservapedia's status as a viable competitor to Wikipedia through the removal of vandalism, hate, personal attacks and unsupported bias; I've also decided to put my efforts into the following:

In addition to my previously stated and overarching goal of increasing Conservapedia's status as a viable competitor to Wikipedia through the removal of vandalism, hate, personal attacks and unsupported bias; I've also decided to put my efforts into the following:

#Eliminate/improve the lists of Orphaned pages, Dead-end pages and Oldest pages where ever my knowledge and ability will allow. '''UPDATE:''' I have reduced the "Dead-end page" list by '''more than 40%''' (less than 420 left to go after starting at over 700!) and intend to continue until it reaches zero.

#Eliminate/improve the lists of Orphaned pages, Dead-end pages and Oldest pages where ever my knowledge and ability will allow. '''UPDATE:''' I have reduced the "Dead-end page" list by '''more than 50%''' (less than 350 left to go after starting at over 700!) and intend to continue until it reaches zero. '''UPDATE 2([[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:23, 23 April 2013 (EDT)):''' Even though some people are standing in the way of progress, by refusing to un-protect or even add wikilinks to their protected pages, it still marches on, with the help of [[User:Taj|Taj]], [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] and others we are steadily making our way toward an empty list!

==A Sad Sate of Affairs==

==A Sad Sate of Affairs==

Some aspects of this site are in dire need of improvement... Someone needs to decide whether they want to make this site a viable alternative to Wikipedia or allow a small group of editors continue to run rampant over the [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] in order to promote their extreme beliefs and outside interests. Filling a page with non-encyclopedic, and in many cases unsupported, statements and then locking the page should be universally condemned on any website which claims to want allow the "best of the public" to present the facts in order for conservatism to prevail.

Some aspects of this site are in dire need of improvement... Someone needs to decide whether they want to make this site a viable alternative to Wikipedia or allow a small group of editors continue to run rampant over the [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] in order to promote their extreme beliefs and outside interests. Filling a page with non-encyclopedic, and in many cases unsupported, statements and then locking the page should be universally condemned on any website which claims to want allow the "best of the public" to present the facts in order for conservatism to prevail.