Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + + + + +
credence?
I agree; this is ridiculous. At the moment, you have a vaguely non-biased article, then jammed hamfistedly into the middle of it you have another cheap shot at liberalism. You provide two examples and therefore "prove" your point. No. No real evidence is provided; even the people who buy 8 out of 10 cats stuff wouldn't be fooled by this pathetic attack. Either provide real evidence, or remove it. It's that simple or you fall into the same trap of bigotry as you claim did Wikipedia.
I agree; this is ridiculous. At the moment, you have a vaguely non-biased article, then jammed hamfistedly into the middle of it you have another cheap shot at liberalism. You provide two examples and therefore "prove" your point. No. No real evidence is provided; even the people who buy 8 out of 10 cats stuff wouldn't be fooled by this pathetic attack. Either provide real evidence, or remove it. It's that simple or you fall into the same trap of bigotry as you claim did Wikipedia.
[[User:KarlJaeger|KarlJaeger]] 06:03, 5 April 2008 (EDT)
[[User:KarlJaeger|KarlJaeger]] 06:03, 5 April 2008 (EDT)
==Validity of the award==
Considering that around 2% of the time, the award is for false reporting, maybe we shouldn't give it so much credence. We got the false reporting about the USSR, on top of the [[Alex Haley]] hoax.
[[Roots]] was largely copied from a novel by [[Harold Courlander]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:58, 5 May 2013 (EDT)