2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: +
→Debate
::Oh, you mean I have to actually read all that talk above? :-( --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:42, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
::Oh, you mean I have to actually read all that talk above? :-( --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:42, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I can summarize it. Two prominent mainstream publication printed false information with the express intent to defame the VP of the US. It has been proven false, with damage to those publications reputations. Discussing it any further serves no purpose, IMO. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:44, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I can summarize it. Two prominent mainstream publication printed false information with the express intent to defame the VP of the US. It has been proven false, with damage to those publications reputations. Discussing it any further serves no purpose, IMO. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:44, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
I thought it was more, Rob and I disagree as to the interpretation of a VP's statements in a transcript. As a result, he would like to strike any mention of it from the article. -'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 16:46, 13 April 2007 (EDT)