Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 679: Line 679:     
:Excellent work!  There were some recent additions that are not high quality enough to remain, and not worthy of inclusion in the count.  I'll revert them now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 08:59, 10 May 2013 (EDT)
 
:Excellent work!  There were some recent additions that are not high quality enough to remain, and not worthy of inclusion in the count.  I'll revert them now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 08:59, 10 May 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
::*Thank you for your praise! But I'd like to see someone double-checking the numbers!
 +
::*You removed ''coolant'', a term you had introduced into the list on [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&diff=801887&oldid=801500 Aug 7, 2010]. This implies that every one of the '''nine''' ''perfect geometric fits'' since August 2010 was false - and it highlights the problematic approach of your ''statistics'', which I already mentioned above in [[#Conservative Words hypothesis is errant]]. I see that you haven't answered to my comments in that section...
 +
::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:00, 10 May 2013 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu