| Line 51: |
Line 51: |
| | | | |
| | '''Liberalism''' | | '''Liberalism''' |
| − | #virtually never criticize hateful comments or behavior by a fellow [[liberal]] | + | #Virtually never criticize hateful comments or behavior by a fellow [[liberal]] |
| − | #ignoring or failing to recognize abstract concepts and denying obvious correlations between liberal beliefs and destructive behavior | + | #Ignoring or failing to recognize abstract concepts and denying obvious correlations between liberal beliefs and destructive behavior |
| − | #denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]] | + | #Denial that people can grow out of a [[liberal]] viewpoint, such as [[atheism]] |
| − | #calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref> | + | #Calling the use of the term '''[[liberal]]''' when used in a derogatory context "stupid"<ref>"Stop candying Liberal around like that... It just looks stupid." Graham 19:55, 22 September 2007 (EDT) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/archive26#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref> |
| | #Will often deny being a [[liberal]], or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles. | | #Will often deny being a [[liberal]], or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles. |
| − | #often declare that an adversary should be "ashamed of himself," while rarely saying that about a supportive co-[[liberal]] (such as [[Ted Kennedy]])<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#I.27m_Done Porthos on 27 September 2007 </ref> <ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=47632&diff=327149&oldid=326555&rcid=353756] RidiculouslyLiberal, November 3, 2007</ref> | + | #Often declare that an adversary should be "ashamed of himself," while rarely saying that about a supportive co-[[liberal]] (such as [[Ted Kennedy]])<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#I.27m_Done Porthos on 27 September 2007 </ref> <ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=47632&diff=327149&oldid=326555&rcid=353756] RidiculouslyLiberal, November 3, 2007</ref> |
| − | #willing to give away everything held dear by the majority to avoid serious conflict (such [[liberal]]s who wish to pull our troops out of Iraq, and embolden the [[terrorist]]s). | + | #Willing to give away everything held dear by the majority to avoid serious conflict (such [[liberal]]s who wish to pull our troops out of Iraq, and embolden the [[terrorist]]s). |
| − | #thinking in terms of what someone likes or doesn't like, or has or doesn't have, or belongs or doesn't belong | + | #Thinking in terms of what someone likes or doesn't like, or has or doesn't have, or belongs or doesn't belong |
| | #"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior. | | #"Contrariness is creativity to the untalented" - Dennis Miller's general observation about liberal behavior. |
| | | | |
| | '''Personal traits''' | | '''Personal traits''' |
| − | #unjustified claims of expertise, authority or knowledge | + | #Unjustified claims of expertise, authority or knowledge |
| − | #deny the obvious and embrace the implausible; see examples of [[liberal denial]] | + | #Deny the obvious and embrace the implausible; see examples of [[liberal denial]] |
| − | #denial of accountability | + | #Denial of accountability |
| − | #concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them | + | #Concealing one's [[liberal]] views rather than admitting them |
| − | #attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true | + | #Attempting to appear smarter than others, when often the opposite is true |
| − | #attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true | + | #Attempting to appear more reasonable than others, when often the opposite is true |
| − | #preference for obscenity and profanity<ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref> | + | #Preference for obscenity and profanity<ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref> |
| − | #silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref> | + | #Silly demands for apologies.<ref>[http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RPBHO80&show_article=1 Senate Condemns "General Betray Us" Ad]</ref> |
| | #Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Liberal_Style&oldid=266960]</ref> | | #Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Liberal_Style&oldid=266960]</ref> |
| − | #resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]] | + | #Resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]] |
| | '''Politics''' | | '''Politics''' |
| − | #believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office | + | #Believing that bureaucratic honors or appointments are meaningful achievements, as fights over political office |
| − | #attempting to control the definitions of words through [[political correctness]]. For example, referring to [[Israel]] as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda. | + | #Attempting to control the definitions of words through [[political correctness]]. For example, referring to [[Israel]] as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda. |
| | '''Religion''' | | '''Religion''' |
| − | #hostility to [[faith]] | + | #Hostility to [[faith]] |
| − | #selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain. | + | #Selectively citing the [[Bible]] when convenient, even though they hold much of it in disdain. |
| | '''Science''' | | '''Science''' |
| − | #overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]] | + | #Overreliance on [[hearsay]], such as the false claim that most support [[evolution]] |
| − | #claim that science supports their position, and ignore any evidence that shows their position to be false | + | #Claim that science supports their position, and ignore any evidence that shows their position to be false |
| − | #attempting to control the rules of evidence used in a debate. For example, claiming that [[Young Earth Creationism]] is false, and then refusing to allow supporting evidence by claiming that the scientists are religiously motivated. | + | #Attempting to control the rules of evidence used in a debate. For example, claiming that [[Young Earth Creationism]] is false, and then refusing to allow supporting evidence by claiming that the scientists are religiously motivated. |
| | '''Social issues''' | | '''Social issues''' |
| − | #can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]). | + | #Can't understand the difference between identity (e.g., color of one's skin), perspective (e.g., Judeo-[[Christian]]) and bias (e.g., [[Bias in Wikipedia]]). |
| | #Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women. | | #Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women. |
| − | #reluctance to admit that anything is morally wrong | + | #Reluctance to admit that anything is morally wrong |
| − | #insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!" | + | #Insisting on a mindless equality, as in "if you have an entry for [[Beethoven]], then you must allow entries for vulgar rap artists!" |
| | | | |
| | == References == | | == References == |