Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Denial ...: use less loaded headers. apostles typically did not comment on other writings. John did not comment on any of the other three Gospels.
Line 102: Line 102:  
Because the author wanted to be understood? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 03:42, 3 December 2012 (EST)
 
Because the author wanted to be understood? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 03:42, 3 December 2012 (EST)
   −
== Patently absurd ... ==
+
== Denial ... ==
    
... is the idea that this epistle was written in the time between the Resurrection and the Ascension:
 
... is the idea that this epistle was written in the time between the Resurrection and the Ascension:
Line 112: Line 112:     
::So, it is not only written by [[Jesus]] himself, but is the oldest written text in the [[New Testament]]? Kept by an unknown disciple all for himself for decades, as no other apostle commented on it? '' „This logical explanation is the most plausible one.”'' Your explanation is neither logical nor plausible, just wishful thinking. Therefore it doesn't belong into any encyclopedic articles - it even looks bad in [[Liberal denial]]!  --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:55, 19 May 2013 (EDT)
 
::So, it is not only written by [[Jesus]] himself, but is the oldest written text in the [[New Testament]]? Kept by an unknown disciple all for himself for decades, as no other apostle commented on it? '' „This logical explanation is the most plausible one.”'' Your explanation is neither logical nor plausible, just wishful thinking. Therefore it doesn't belong into any encyclopedic articles - it even looks bad in [[Liberal denial]]!  --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:55, 19 May 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::It could be oldest in the New Testament, or parts of the Gospel of John could be older.  Why would the relative dates matter?
 +
 +
:::As to your other objection, apostles typically did not comment on other writings.  John did not comment on any of the other three Gospels.  Would anyone conclude that the other three are somehow defective for that reason?  Of course not.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:22, 19 May 2013 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Navigation menu