Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 50:
Line 50: − − Are you serious? Guns are necessary to protecting our liberty. Without guns people would go crazy and murder everyone. I need my AR15 and RPG to hunt and feed my family.
Talk:National Rifle Association (view source)
Revision as of 16:34, May 20, 2013
, 16:34, May 20, 2013Reverted edits by RontheDon (talk) to last revision by Ed Poor
::: First of all, that's a very different claim than claiming that it is a natural right. Second that argument in any event has a multitude of problems including that it implies that we have rights to pretty much all weapons. I don't think anyone would try to argue that their is a natural human right to possess nuclear weapons. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
::: First of all, that's a very different claim than claiming that it is a natural right. Second that argument in any event has a multitude of problems including that it implies that we have rights to pretty much all weapons. I don't think anyone would try to argue that their is a natural human right to possess nuclear weapons. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 16:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Oh, I was never claiming that we have a right to possess all weapons. We have a right to "Possess enough power to defend our life should the need arise." Thats a very vague statement, and its purposely vague, as so that we can interpret it to mean what we want it to mean when we need it.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 17:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
::::Oh, I was never claiming that we have a right to possess all weapons. We have a right to "Possess enough power to defend our life should the need arise." Thats a very vague statement, and its purposely vague, as so that we can interpret it to mean what we want it to mean when we need it.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 17:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)