Block, SkipCaptcha
157
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
no edit summary
Good points, I see the leaders since 1990 as this, Major:Wet,
Good points, I see the leaders since 1990 as this, Major:Wet,
Hague: wet. IDS: damp. Howard: dry. Cameron wet
Hague: wet. IDS: damp. Howard: dry. Cameron wet
From an Activist point of view, I would disagree with Hague and IDS. Hague is a "True Blue" but is having serious problems showing that inside his Cabinet position due to the party line that Cameron is pumping out. While he was leader, he got thrown under the bus by the wets who were starting to get hooks into the main party. He attempted to follow Thatcherite policies but Tony Blair's populism was too much to take on for the quite young Hague at the time. IDS isn't damp, he's a political chameleon. He mostly stays in the "true blue" camp but he's definitely the left of it. Imagine a mini political spectrum inside the "True Blues" [[User:Ryancsh|Ryancsh]] 20/05/2013 18:25GMT