1,631
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 125:
Line 125: + + + + + Line 134:
Line 139: + + + +
Debate:Is the theory of macroevolution true? (view source)
Revision as of 23:21, January 17, 2007
, 23:21, January 17, 2007no edit summary
'''Further Reply:''' Heat flowing to cooler places is entirely irrelevant to our discussion. Please elaborate. --[[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]]
'''Further Reply:''' Heat flowing to cooler places is entirely irrelevant to our discussion. Please elaborate. --[[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]]
'''Comment:''' You should try to bear with Mr. Schlafly's abstract analogies (I know that they rarely make sense) and respond to his points that are doing you any harm; e.g. "Overall the mutation sickle cell anemia is obviously harmful. The same is true for all mutations."
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 18:21, 17 January 2007 (EST)
: 5. Species have being going extinct rather than being generated.
: 5. Species have being going extinct rather than being generated.
'''Further reply:''' The organism did not devolve. Please explain this reply further. --[[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]]
'''Further reply:''' The organism did not devolve. Please explain this reply further. --[[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]]
I think that by "devolve" he is trying to point out that organisms only ''lose'' genetic information through mutation; evolution relies upon the ''gain'' genetic information.
--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 18:21, 17 January 2007 (EST)
: 6. All unaided things become more disordered and scattered over time.
: 6. All unaided things become more disordered and scattered over time.