Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
What about economic positions? laissez faire capitalism, pro private sector, anti public sector unless service is vital, ie military, curbs on union power, low Taxation, minimal government spending. Would you be offended if I add these?--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 20:06, 23 May 2013 (EDT)
 
What about economic positions? laissez faire capitalism, pro private sector, anti public sector unless service is vital, ie military, curbs on union power, low Taxation, minimal government spending. Would you be offended if I add these?--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 20:06, 23 May 2013 (EDT)
 
:I wonder about some of those listed as well.  I can't imagine for example that a modern conservative would be in favour of paid parental leave and access to free or cheap healthcare for babies and infants, yet without support for those things I would say one could not claim to be pro-life or pro-parental rights.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 20:20, 23 May 2013 (EDT)
 
:I wonder about some of those listed as well.  I can't imagine for example that a modern conservative would be in favour of paid parental leave and access to free or cheap healthcare for babies and infants, yet without support for those things I would say one could not claim to be pro-life or pro-parental rights.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 20:20, 23 May 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Economic issues follow the social ones, like a tail on a dog.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu