| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | | | |
| | CreationWiki is actively expanding into multiple languages. The core site is written in [[English]], but translated versions of the site already exist in [[Spanish]], [[German]], [[Korean]], [[Hebrew]], [[Chinese]], [[Polish]], [[Portuguese]] and [[French]]. | | CreationWiki is actively expanding into multiple languages. The core site is written in [[English]], but translated versions of the site already exist in [[Spanish]], [[German]], [[Korean]], [[Hebrew]], [[Chinese]], [[Polish]], [[Portuguese]] and [[French]]. |
| − | == Contrasted with EvoWki == | + | == Contrasted with EvoWiki == |
| | | | |
| − | Unlike [[EvoWiki]], which is a wiki that is archived and not actively being edited, CreationWiki has active editors. In recent years, interest in atheism websites and evolutionism has declined.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/jesus-vs-richard-dawkins-and-pz-myers_28.html Round 2: Jesus vs. Evolution and PZ Myers and Richard Dawkins - Jesus triumphs again! Onward Christian soldiers!]</ref><ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/internet-atheism-and-skepticism-thrill.html Internet atheism: The Thrill is gone]</ref> The website traffic tracking company Compete reported that as of August 20, 2012, EvoWiki had only 771 unique visitors a month.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/did-attempt-to-revive-evowiki-fail-is.html Did an attempt to revive EvoWiki fail? Is Google Panda mauling EvoWiki, Talk.Origins and atheist websites?]</ref><ref>[http://siteanalytics.compete.com/evolutionwiki.org/ Compete - EvoWiki]</ref>
| + | In response to critics of CreationWiki who note its small size and editor base compared to the anti-creationist [[Wikipedia]], proponents of CreationWiki claim that all comparisons should be made to another specialized wiki, [[EvoWiki]]. Unlike EvoWiki, which is a wiki that is archived and not actively being edited, CreationWiki has active editors. In recent years, interest in atheism websites and evolutionism has declined.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/jesus-vs-richard-dawkins-and-pz-myers_28.html Round 2: Jesus vs. Evolution and PZ Myers and Richard Dawkins - Jesus triumphs again! Onward Christian soldiers!]</ref><ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/internet-atheism-and-skepticism-thrill.html Internet atheism: The Thrill is gone]</ref> The website traffic tracking company Compete reported that as of August 20, 2012, EvoWiki had only 771 unique visitors a month.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/did-attempt-to-revive-evowiki-fail-is.html Did an attempt to revive EvoWiki fail? Is Google Panda mauling EvoWiki, Talk.Origins and atheist websites?]</ref><ref>[http://siteanalytics.compete.com/evolutionwiki.org/ Compete - EvoWiki]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | Also, [[global atheism]] and agnosticism is shrinking in adherents while [[global Christianity]] and creationism is seeing rapid growth.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/globally-worldviews-of-atheism-and-non.html Globally the worldviews of atheism and non-religious (agnostic) are declining while global Christianity is exploding in adherents]</ref> | | Also, [[global atheism]] and agnosticism is shrinking in adherents while [[global Christianity]] and creationism is seeing rapid growth.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/globally-worldviews-of-atheism-and-non.html Globally the worldviews of atheism and non-religious (agnostic) are declining while global Christianity is exploding in adherents]</ref> |
| − |
| |
| − | === Archived status of EvoWiki ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A supporter of the [[Question evolution! campaign]] quipped concerning EvoWiki's archived status:
| |
| − | {{cquote|EvoWiki is an archived wiki. They must know that nobody wants to edit EvoWiki. It is like an ugly and mangy puppy that nobody wants to play with. Can you blame them for choosing to archive it and keep it archived? Evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer the [http://creation/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] of the Question Evolution! Campaign. So getting editors to edit EvoWiki would be a tremendously hard sell.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/did-attempt-to-revive-evowiki-fail-is.html Did an attempt to revive EvoWiki fail? Is Google Panda mauling EvoWiki, Talk.Origins and atheist websites?]</ref><ref>[http://siteanalytics.compete.com/evolutionwiki.org/ Compete - EvoWiki]</ref>}}
| |
| | | | |
| | == CreationWiki and creationist video evangelism resource == | | == CreationWiki and creationist video evangelism resource == |