Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
explanatory extension for better understanding
Line 20: Line 20:  
|access date=27.09.2012
 
|access date=27.09.2012
 
}}</ref>:
 
}}</ref>:
−
**''"...The true distribution must either be uniform or increase outward, leaving the observer in a unique position. But the unwelcome supposition of a favoured location '''must be avoided at all costs'''. Therefore, we accept the uniform distribution, and '''assume''' that space is sensibly transparent. Then the data from the surveys are simply and fully accounted for by the energy corrections alone - without the additional postulate of an expanding universe."''
+
**''"...The true distribution [of [[nebulae]]] must either be uniform or increase outward, leaving the observer in a unique position. But the unwelcome supposition of a favoured location '''must be avoided at all costs'''. Therefore, we accept the uniform distribution, and '''assume''' that space is sensibly transparent. Then the data from the surveys are simply and fully accounted for by the energy corrections alone - without the additional postulate of an expanding universe."''
 
**''"...'''There must be no favoured location in the universe, no centre, no boundary; all must see the universe alike'''. And, '''in order to ensure this situation, the cosmologist, postulates''' spatial isotropy and spatial homogeneity, which is his way of stating that the universe must be pretty much alike everywhere and in all directions. The kinds of universes that would be compatible with the relativity principle and the '''assumption of homogeneity''' have been determined by intricate mathematical reasoning."''
 
**''"...'''There must be no favoured location in the universe, no centre, no boundary; all must see the universe alike'''. And, '''in order to ensure this situation, the cosmologist, postulates''' spatial isotropy and spatial homogeneity, which is his way of stating that the universe must be pretty much alike everywhere and in all directions. The kinds of universes that would be compatible with the relativity principle and the '''assumption of homogeneity''' have been determined by intricate mathematical reasoning."''
 
**''...Thus the density of the nebular distribution increases outwards, symmetrically in all directions, leaving the observer in a unique position. '''Such a favoured position, of course, is intolerable'''; moreover, it represents '''a discrepancy with the theory''', because the theory postulates homogeneity. Therefore, in order to restore homogeneity, and to escape '''the horror of a unique position'''{{#tag:ref|Similar embarrassment known from history of science, or philosophy, respectively, and related to [[vacuum]], was expressed by famous expression ''"[[horror vacui]]."''|group=note}}, the departures from uniformity, which are introduced by the recession factors, must be compensated by the second term representing effects of spatial curvature.''
 
**''...Thus the density of the nebular distribution increases outwards, symmetrically in all directions, leaving the observer in a unique position. '''Such a favoured position, of course, is intolerable'''; moreover, it represents '''a discrepancy with the theory''', because the theory postulates homogeneity. Therefore, in order to restore homogeneity, and to escape '''the horror of a unique position'''{{#tag:ref|Similar embarrassment known from history of science, or philosophy, respectively, and related to [[vacuum]], was expressed by famous expression ''"[[horror vacui]]."''|group=note}}, the departures from uniformity, which are introduced by the recession factors, must be compensated by the second term representing effects of spatial curvature.''
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu