Changes

|publisher=CMI

|publisher=CMI

|url=http://creation.com/wicked-bible

|url=http://creation.com/wicked-bible

}}</ref> The name of the 'Queen James' version (QJV) is based on controversial speculation contested by historians that King James was homosexual.<ref>{{cite web|title=New 'Queen James' Bible offers gay-friendly Scripture|author=|publisher=msnNOW.com|date=12/18/2012|accessdate=24/02/2013|url=http://now.msn.com/queen-james-bible-offers-gay-friendly-scripture|quote=According to the editors, King James I, the man behind the popular Bible translation, was a bisexual "known amongst friends and courtiers as 'Queen James' because of his many gay lovers." This new version, named in his honor, aims "to prevent homophobic interpretations," with several controversial verses strategically tweaked. "We wanted to make a book filled with the word of God that nobody could use to incorrectly condemn God’s LGBT children," the editors explain.}}</ref> The QJV reinterprets several biblical verses in an effort to impose and advocate a foreign [[homosexual agenda]] on the original indigenous biblical data:

}}</ref> The name of the 'Queen James' version (QJV) is based on controversial speculation contested by historians that King James was [[homosexual]].<ref>{{cite web|title=New 'Queen James' Bible offers gay-friendly Scripture|author=|publisher=msnNOW.com|date=12/18/2012|accessdate=24/02/2013|url=http://now.msn.com/queen-james-bible-offers-gay-friendly-scripture|quote=According to the editors, King James I, the man behind the popular Bible translation, was a bisexual "known amongst friends and courtiers as 'Queen James' because of his many gay lovers." This new version, named in his honor, aims "to prevent homophobic interpretations," with several controversial verses strategically tweaked. "We wanted to make a book filled with the word of God that nobody could use to incorrectly condemn God’s LGBT children," the editors explain.}}</ref> The QJV reinterprets several biblical verses in an effort to impose and advocate a foreign [[homosexual agenda]] on the original indigenous biblical data:

**In Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, there is the superfluous sentence "in the temple of Molech" read into the levitical texts.<ref>{{cite web|title=Queen James Bible Claims To Be First-Ever 'Gay Bible,' But Some Say It Rewrites Scripture|author=Meredith Bennett-Smith|publisher=msnNOW.com|date=12/18/2012|accessdate=24/02/2013|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/queen-james-bible-claims-first-ever-gay-bible_n_2324962.html|quote=This new version updates several passages from the original version that address homosexuality, including this passage from Leviticus 18:22:

**In Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13, there is the superfluous sentence "in the temple of Molech" read into the levitical texts.<ref>{{cite web|title=Queen James Bible Claims To Be First-Ever 'Gay Bible,' But Some Say It Rewrites Scripture|author=Meredith Bennett-Smith|publisher=msnNOW.com|date=12/18/2012|accessdate=24/02/2013|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/queen-james-bible-claims-first-ever-gay-bible_n_2324962.html|quote=This new version updates several passages from the original version that address homosexuality, including this passage from Leviticus 18:22:

KJV: Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.

KJV: Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination.

*The 'mysterious gnosis' pertinent to a unique secret knowledge and sole access by pro-LGBT 'elite', is often in LGBT ideology referred to as ''"an evolutionary enigma"''.<ref>{{cite web|title=Homosexuality as a Consequence of Epigenetically Canalized Sexual Development|author=William R. Rice, Urban Friberg and Sergey Gavrilets|date=December 2012|accessdate=24-Feb-2013|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.1086/668167.pdf?acceptTC=true|quote=This paper argues that sexually antagonistic selection can also be involved in epigenetic effects and explain the enigmatic high prevalence of several fitness-reducing human characters. ... Homosexuality is frequently considered to be an unusual phenotype because it represents an evolutionary enigma —a trait that is expected to reduce Darwinian fitness, yet it persists at substantial frequency across many different (possibly all) human populations.}}</ref> The pseudo-Christianity made to fit the LGBT agenda is usually labelled as ''"progressive"'' [Christianity].<ref>{{cite web|title=Schlesinger: Prestaňme sa točiť okolo hriechu|author=Michal Piško|publisher=SME.SK|date=8 June 2012|accessdate=24 Feb 2013|url=http://www.sme.sk/c/6410997/schlesinger-prestanme-sa-tocit-okolo-hriechu.html#ixzz2Lqf1wUA2|language=Slovak|quote=„Na Slovensku, žiaľ, neexistuje iný názor cirkvi na túto tému. V zahraničí je tento názor cirkví podstatne progresívnejší, žila som v USA, mám priateľov zo škandinávskych krajín a tam sa nevylučuje byť gejom a dobrým veriacim. Nie je to univerzálny názor každého cirkevného spoločenstva na svete.“}}</ref>  

*The 'mysterious gnosis' pertinent to a unique secret knowledge and sole access by pro-LGBT 'elite', is often in LGBT ideology referred to as ''"an evolutionary enigma"''.<ref>{{cite web|title=Homosexuality as a Consequence of Epigenetically Canalized Sexual Development|author=William R. Rice, Urban Friberg and Sergey Gavrilets|date=December 2012|accessdate=24-Feb-2013|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.1086/668167.pdf?acceptTC=true|quote=This paper argues that sexually antagonistic selection can also be involved in epigenetic effects and explain the enigmatic high prevalence of several fitness-reducing human characters. ... Homosexuality is frequently considered to be an unusual phenotype because it represents an evolutionary enigma —a trait that is expected to reduce Darwinian fitness, yet it persists at substantial frequency across many different (possibly all) human populations.}}</ref> The pseudo-Christianity made to fit the LGBT agenda is usually labelled as ''"progressive"'' [Christianity].<ref>{{cite web|title=Schlesinger: Prestaňme sa točiť okolo hriechu|author=Michal Piško|publisher=SME.SK|date=8 June 2012|accessdate=24 Feb 2013|url=http://www.sme.sk/c/6410997/schlesinger-prestanme-sa-tocit-okolo-hriechu.html#ixzz2Lqf1wUA2|language=Slovak|quote=„Na Slovensku, žiaľ, neexistuje iný názor cirkvi na túto tému. V zahraničí je tento názor cirkví podstatne progresívnejší, žila som v USA, mám priateľov zo škandinávskych krajín a tam sa nevylučuje byť gejom a dobrým veriacim. Nie je to univerzálny názor každého cirkevného spoločenstva na svete.“}}</ref>  

*Fr. Rutler, who holds a doctorate in sacred theology, and a master of studies from Oxford University, maintains that homosexual activists and secular liberals do not understand the relationship between the human race and nature because they are essentially Gnostics, in their dualism they see the natural world, i.e. the material world, as contrary to anything divine and the result of energies other than God. To say that the Word was made flesh, as in the New Testament, is a total contradiction to the Gnostic, because the Gnostic thinks the divine can have nothing to do with the flesh. As a consequence homosexuals do not see marriage as an essentially divine institution – they see it as a legal construction that can be changed at will. “They see a Supreme Court changing the law on marriage and say it is valid. But from the point of natural law, it would be like saying the Supreme Court could repeal the law of gravity.” The homosexual is a classic Gnostic, because the homosexual does not understand how gender is intrinsic to God’s will for the human race. Male-ness and female-ness are not arbitrary categories.<ref>{{cite web |title=Gays Unable to Accept Pope’s Defense of Environment and Nature’s ‘Law,’ Says Top Theologian |author=Michael W. Chapman |publisher=CNSNews.com |date=December 24, 2008 |url=http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gays-unable-accept-pope-s-defense-environment-and-nature-s-law-says-top-theologian |accessdate=26-May-2013}}</ref>

*Fr. Rutler, who holds a doctorate in sacred theology, and a master of studies from Oxford University, maintains that homosexual activists and secular liberals do not understand the relationship between the human race and nature because they are essentially Gnostics, in their dualism they see the natural world, i.e. the material world, as contrary to anything divine and the result of energies other than God. To say that the Word was made flesh, as in the New Testament, is a total contradiction to the Gnostic, because the Gnostic thinks the divine can have nothing to do with the flesh. As a consequence homosexuals do not see marriage as an essentially divine institution – they see it as a legal construction that can be changed at will. “They see a Supreme Court changing the law on marriage and say it is valid. But from the point of natural law, it would be like saying the Supreme Court could repeal the law of gravity.” The homosexual is a classic Gnostic, because the homosexual does not understand how [[gender]] is intrinsic to God’s will for the [[human race]]. [[Male]]-ness and [[female]]-ness are not arbitrary categories.<ref>{{cite web |title=Gays Unable to Accept Pope’s Defense of Environment and Nature’s ‘Law,’ Says Top Theologian |author=Michael W. Chapman |publisher=CNSNews.com |date=December 24, 2008 |url=http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gays-unable-accept-pope-s-defense-environment-and-nature-s-law-says-top-theologian |accessdate=26-May-2013}}</ref>

===Gnostic traits in Liberal Media===

===Gnostic traits in Liberal Media===