SkipCaptcha
3,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 30:
Line 30: − Line 38:
Line 37: − − ==To Markman== − This page is here following an agreement between AlanE and Karajou. If Karajou wants it deleted then that is it, but you have no right to arbitarily break i9nto that agreement.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 16:29, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − :You were never given permission for engaging in excessive talk pollution. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 16:32, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − − ::Markman: Karajou agreed to re-instate this page if I wrote an article to his satisfaction. To my knowledge the article is satisfactory - the page was reinstated '''by Karajou!''' and can be said to exist with the permission of Karajou seeing as he, in effect, created it. Since then there have been three or four edits totalling less than 50 words in more than three months. In fact the words generated in this little "conversation" total more than those puns added since Karajou replaced the page. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 16:51, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − :::Karajou gave permission to reinstate the talk page - not any talk pollution in it. Notice that I'm not trying to have the talk page deleted, just to have it clean from talk pollution. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 16:53, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − − Karajou did not "give permission to reinstate the talk page" he reinstated it himself. It is a '''talk page''' for goodness sake! People '''talk''' on it. As far as the pun-page is concerned, I doubt whether I spent more than two minutes on it in over 4 years writing what? about 120 words (not counting the tithes.) In that same time I wrote up to 100,000 words of information at an average of over 300 words per article. So for you to invoke the 90/10 rule as you did with PennyT shows either ignorance of the rule or dishonesty. − :I still want to add to this site but it's getting difficult. This of course is what you want. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 17:34, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − ::It doesn't matter how much you spend on it. It's still talk pollution and it's making conservapedia look unprofessional. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 17:40, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − :::Oh please!! Why, if it looks so "unprofessional" did Karajou reinstate it? And why have you deleted the edits that Karajou reinstated? And why, if it offends you so much, didn't you delete the page when it was first reinstated? Why wait over three months? [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 18:00, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − :::"Why wait over three months?" I was being a coward and decided to do the easy thing rather than the right thing. I admit my fault. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 18:02, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − :I respect your honesty in this instance. We'll just have to wait and see what Karajou thinks. After all, he installed the page as part of a deal, so he should be the only one to delete it. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 18:37, 13 June 2013 (EDT) − − There was nothing wrong with the talk page, including the so-called "talk pollution"; there is nothing wrong with banter between people on the ways and means of making an article better; there is nothing wrong with people engaging in polite, fun conversation. Sorry, Markman, but I'm siding with AlanE on this. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:31, 14 June 2013 (EDT) − :Thank you K., [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 03:00, 14 June 2013 (EDT)
Per instruction from an admin. See talk page history
: That is a bit sexist of you. I would think a female should get a block too if she edit excessively here. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 01:30, 5 March 2013 (EST)
: That is a bit sexist of you. I would think a female should get a block too if she edit excessively here. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 01:30, 5 March 2013 (EST)
::This is serious business Dvergne. Flippant remarks and/or humour are not acceptable and will be met with a lengthy block. I will try to plead your case but I would expect a month block, if not longer. Perhaps there may be a case for mercy this time. Besides, I should bring your attention to the rules of [http://www.conservapedia.com/Most_Common_Writing_Errors conservative grammar] which seem to imply that where an person's gender is unknown one should use the masculine pronoun. You might not be convinced by this rule, but there you have it. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 04:38, 5 March 2013 (EST)
::This is serious business Dvergne. Flippant remarks and/or humour are not acceptable and will be met with a lengthy block. I will try to plead your case but I would expect a month block, if not longer. Perhaps there may be a case for mercy this time. Besides, I should bring your attention to the rules of [http://www.conservapedia.com/Most_Common_Writing_Errors conservative grammar] which seem to imply that where an person's gender is unknown one should use the masculine pronoun. You might not be convinced by this rule, but there you have it. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 04:38, 5 March 2013 (EST)
==Article==
==Article==
*Peary and Cook's attempts
*Peary and Cook's attempts
*Popular culture [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:53, 1 March 2013 (EST)
*Popular culture [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:53, 1 March 2013 (EST)