| Line 100: |
Line 100: |
| | :::::When you have to rely on armchair internet psychobabbling and cannot address the fruits of your religion, then something is seriously amiss. Nevertheless, Jesus said, "You shall know them by their fruits." and liberal Catholics are not "spiritual" to use a term that you used above and were unsuccessful in defending. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:58, 16 June 2013 (EDT) | | :::::When you have to rely on armchair internet psychobabbling and cannot address the fruits of your religion, then something is seriously amiss. Nevertheless, Jesus said, "You shall know them by their fruits." and liberal Catholics are not "spiritual" to use a term that you used above and were unsuccessful in defending. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:58, 16 June 2013 (EDT) |
| | ::::::You destroyed an interessant discussion over the Catholic Church and evolution with your delusions and obsessions. That's all I'm going to say, Ken. I will not communicate with you anymore unless you revert to the topic at hand. Goodbye. --[[User:Swordsman|Swordsman]] 16:02, 16 June 2013 (EDT) | | ::::::You destroyed an interessant discussion over the Catholic Church and evolution with your delusions and obsessions. That's all I'm going to say, Ken. I will not communicate with you anymore unless you revert to the topic at hand. Goodbye. --[[User:Swordsman|Swordsman]] 16:02, 16 June 2013 (EDT) |
| − | Swordsman, you may find comfort in your psychobabbling, but it cannot alter the fact that theological liberalism is imploding and has bad fruit using objective measurements nor does it have any evidence supporting it. Keep retreating to the subjective world of psychobabbling, but you are not fooling anybody - not even yourself. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 16 June 2013 (EDT) | + | Swordsman, you may find comfort in your psychobabbling, but it cannot alter the fact that theological liberalism is imploding and has bad fruit using objective measurements nor does it have any evidence supporting it (the [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/evidence-for-christianity-websites-and.html evidence] is on the side of biblical Christianity). Keep retreating to the subjective world of psychobabbling, but you are not fooling anybody - not even yourself. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 16 June 2013 (EDT) |
| | ::Really, if that is the case, show me some peer-reviewed papers, from a trustworthy and reputable source! [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 16:35, 16 June 2013 (EDT) | | ::Really, if that is the case, show me some peer-reviewed papers, from a trustworthy and reputable source! [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 16:35, 16 June 2013 (EDT) |
| | + | :::Addendum - that isn't from QE.blogspot.com. |