Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Beware reading the 1st Amendment in isolation
Line 34: Line 34:     
A classic mistake. First you read the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, to get a true understanding of what their original intent was in the historical record of that time. Did that already. That way you'll know when a judge or lawyer has subverted the American peoples rights. i.e. Lemon v. Kurtzman. I'm going to give you a clue as to how to identify the big lie that subverts the 1st Amendment into the complete opposite of its original intent. When anyone only mentions the "establishment clause" out of context with the rest of the meaning that the whole amendment is meant to convey. That's why I provided article 52 of the now defunct USSR. It's only a recent attempt to establish the secular Humanist religion as the predominant religion. Recent political reinterpretations don't change the original, and whole true intent of it. So go ahead and site as many cases as you can where the rights of Americans have been taken away in a court of law. Just remember that everything Hitler and his nazis goons did was first made legal by his politically appointed judges and lawyers. You may remember what happened to that group of people that took religious liberty from people? So then, which version of the facts will you be casting your future with?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
 
A classic mistake. First you read the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, to get a true understanding of what their original intent was in the historical record of that time. Did that already. That way you'll know when a judge or lawyer has subverted the American peoples rights. i.e. Lemon v. Kurtzman. I'm going to give you a clue as to how to identify the big lie that subverts the 1st Amendment into the complete opposite of its original intent. When anyone only mentions the "establishment clause" out of context with the rest of the meaning that the whole amendment is meant to convey. That's why I provided article 52 of the now defunct USSR. It's only a recent attempt to establish the secular Humanist religion as the predominant religion. Recent political reinterpretations don't change the original, and whole true intent of it. So go ahead and site as many cases as you can where the rights of Americans have been taken away in a court of law. Just remember that everything Hitler and his nazis goons did was first made legal by his politically appointed judges and lawyers. You may remember what happened to that group of people that took religious liberty from people? So then, which version of the facts will you be casting your future with?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:52, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Beware reading the 1st Amendment in isolation ==
 +
 +
While the 1st Amendment does restrict establishment of religion by Congress, this was changed by ratification & interperetation of the 14th Amendment.  Under the US Supreme Court's incorporation doctrine, the 14th expanded applicability of the 1st & some other amendments to all of government.  While you won't find the exact phrase, "separation of church & state", in the Constitution, this phrase is shorthand for a body of thought that developed over centuries to become the law of the land.  However, it isn't uniformly enforced.[[User:Tom Stockton|Tom Stockton]] 21:55, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Navigation menu