Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,408
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: − + + + + + +
→Further reading
::No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
::No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* Strasser, Mark. "Ex Post Facto Laws, Bills of Attainder, and the Definition of Punishment: On DOMA, the Hawaii Amendment, and Federal Constitutional Constraints," 48 Syracuse L. Rev. 227 (1998) [http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/syrlr48&div=11&id=&page= outline]
* Strasser, Mark. "Ex Post Facto Laws, Bills of Attainder, and the Definition of Punishment: On DOMA, the Hawaii Amendment, and Federal Constitutional Constraints," 48 Syracuse L. Rev. 227 (1998) [http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/syrlr48&div=11&id=&page= outline]
== External links ==
*[http://lessgovisthebest.com/key-provision-in-defense-of-marriage-act-is-struck-down-by-united-states-supreme-court.html Key Provision in Defense of Marriage Act is Struck Down by United States Supreme Court]
== References ==
== References ==